Framing the Constitution: AHSEC Class 12 History notes

Leave a Comment

Get summaries, questions, answers, solutions, notes, extras, PDF and guide of Class 12 (second year) History textbook, chapter 12 Framing the Constitution which is part of the syllabus of students studying under AHSEC/ASSEB (Assam Board). These solutions, however, should only be treated as references and can be modified/changed. 

Summary

The chapter talks about the making of the Indian Constitution. It explains how India became free on 15 August 1947 but was also divided into two countries, India and Pakistan. This time was full of hope but also had many problems. People were moving from one place to another as refugees. Many lost their homes and lives. The leaders of India had to create a new system to govern the country.

The Constituent Assembly was formed to write the Constitution. Its members were chosen by provincial legislatures. Most members were from the Congress party. The Muslim League, which wanted Pakistan, did not join. Socialists also stayed away at first. The Assembly had six important members who played big roles. These included Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabh Bhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad, and B.R. Ambedkar. Ambedkar led the Drafting Committee.

Nehru introduced the Objectives Resolution in December 1946. This resolution outlined the main goals of the Constitution. It said India would be an independent republic. It promised justice, equality, and freedom for all citizens. Special care was to be given to minorities and backward groups. Nehru explained that the ideas came from revolutions in other countries like America and France. But he said India would not copy others. It would create its own path.

The chapter discusses debates in the Assembly. One major issue was separate electorates for minorities. Some leaders felt this would divide people. Others thought it was needed to protect minority rights. In the end, separate electorates were rejected. Instead, reserved seats were agreed upon for some groups.

Another debate was about the powers of the Centre and states. Nehru wanted a strong central government. Other leaders argued for more power to the states. The final decision gave more powers to the Centre but allowed states some control too.

Language was another big issue. Hindi was suggested as the national language. But leaders from non-Hindi areas opposed this. They feared Hindi would dominate other languages. A compromise was reached. Hindi would be the official language, but English would continue for some years.

The Constitution gave voting rights to all adults. This was unusual because other countries gave votes slowly. The Constitution also focused on secularism. All religions were treated equally. Untouchability was abolished. Special rights were given to cultural and educational groups.

The chapter ends by saying the Constitution was signed in December 1949. It was the result of long discussions and compromises. The leaders tried to create a fair and united nation.

Textbook solutions

Answer in 100-150 words

1. What were the ideals expressed in the Objectives Resolution?

Answer : The Objectives Resolution proclaimed India to be an “Independent Sovereign Republic,” guaranteed its citizens justice, equality, and freedom, and assured that “adequate safeguards shall be provided for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and Depressed and Other Backward Classes.” It outlined the defining ideals of the Constitution of Independent India and provided the framework within which the work of constitution-making was to proceed. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his speech, emphasized that the resolution aimed to express the spirit of the Indian people, asserting that no imposition from the British would be accepted by the Indian people. He highlighted the resolve to have an independent sovereign republic and stated that while the word “democratic” was not explicitly used, the whole of their past witnessed their stand for democratic institutions. The resolution also contained the content of democracy and economic democracy.

2. How was the term minority defined by different groups?

Answer : The term “minority” was interpreted differently by various groups. B. Pocker Bahadur from Madras argued that minorities exist in all lands and could not be erased or wished away, emphasizing the need for a political framework where minorities could live in harmony with others. N.G. Ranga, however, defined minorities in economic terms, stating that the real minorities were the poor and downtrodden masses of the country who were depressed, oppressed, and unable to take advantage of ordinary civil rights. Jaipal Singh highlighted that tribals were not a numerical minority but needed protection due to their historical exploitation and dispossession. Dakshayani Velayudhan refused to believe that seventy million Harijans should be considered a minority, focusing instead on the immediate removal of social disabilities.

3. What were the arguments in favour of greater power to the provinces?

Answer : K. Santhanam from Madras argued that a reallocation of powers was necessary to strengthen not only the states but also the Centre. He said, “There is almost an obsession that by adding all kinds of powers to the Centre we can make it strong.” This was a misconception. If the Centre was overburdened with responsibilities, it could not function effectively. By relieving it of some functions and transferring them to the states, the Centre could be made stronger. Regarding the states, Santhanam felt the proposed allocation of powers would cripple them. The fiscal provisions would impoverish the provinces since most taxes, except land revenue, had been made the preserve of the Centre. Without finances, how could the states undertake any project of development? He stated, “I do not want any constitution in which the Unit has to come to the Centre and say ‘I cannot educate my people. I cannot give sanitation, give me a dole for the improvement of roads, of industries.’ Let us rather wipe out the federal system and let us have Unitary system.”

4. Why did Mahatma Gandhi think Hindustani should be the national language?

Answer : Mahatma Gandhi felt that everyone should speak in a language that common people could easily understand. Hindustani, a blend of Hindi and Urdu, was a popular language of a large section of the people of India and was a composite language enriched by the interaction of diverse cultures. Over the years, it had incorporated words and terms from very many different sources and was therefore understood by people from various regions. This multi-cultural language, Mahatma Gandhi thought, would be the ideal language of communication between diverse communities as it could unify Hindus and Muslims, and people of the north and the south.

Short essay-type answers

5. What historical forces shaped the vision of the Constitution?

Answer : The vision of the Constitution was shaped by the tumultuous years preceding its making, which were marked by great hope but also abject disappointment. The Quit India struggle of 1942 and Subhas Chandra Bose’s attempt to win freedom through armed struggle influenced the mood. The rising of the ratings of the Royal Indian Navy in Bombay in 1946 evoked popular sympathy, as did periodic mass protests by workers and peasants across the country. Hindu-Muslim unity manifested in these upsurges, contrasting with the failure of the Congress and Muslim League to achieve religious reconciliation. The Great Calcutta Killings of August 1946 initiated a year of continuous rioting, culminating in massacres during the Partition. Independence on 15 August 1947 brought joy but also the cruel choice for millions of Muslims in India and Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan, facing threats of death or displacement. The princely states posed another problem, with nawabs and maharajas left free to rule their territories, some dreaming of independent power. The Constituent Assembly met against this backdrop, with debates influenced by events outside. The members drew lessons from past revolutions, such as the American and French Revolutions, and recent developments like the Russian Revolution, seeking to learn from their successes and avoid their failures. Nehru emphasized that the system of government established in India had to fit the temper of the people and be acceptable to them, fusing liberal ideas of democracy with socialist ideals of economic justice.

6. Discuss the different arguments made in favour of protection of the oppressed groups.

Answer : The real minorities were the poor and the downtrodden, as argued by N.G. Ranga. He pointed out that it was meaningless for poor people in villages to know they had fundamental rights if they could not enjoy them effectively. They needed protection and support to ensure these rights could be exercised. Jaipal Singh, representing tribals, argued that tribes were not a numerical minority but required protection due to historical exploitation and dispossession. He emphasized the need for conditions that would help tribes reach the level of the general population and advocated for reservation of seats in the legislature to allow tribals to represent themselves.

Dakshayani Velayudhan from Madras argued that what was needed was not all kinds of safeguards but moral safeguards which give protection to the underdogs of the country. She refused to believe that seventy million Harijans should be considered a minority and stressed the immediate removal of social disabilities. J. Nagappa from Madras highlighted that the Depressed Castes formed between 20 and 25 per cent of the total population and their suffering was due to systematic marginalisation, not numerical insignificance. K.J. Khanderkar of the Central Provinces stated that they had been suppressed for thousands of years to such an extent that neither their minds nor bodies and now even their hearts worked.

Hansa Mehta of Bombay demanded justice for women, not reserved seats or separate electorates, asking for social, economic, and political justice, emphasizing equality as the basis of mutual respect and understanding.

7. What connection did some of the members of the Constituent Assembly make between the political situation of the time and the need for a strong Centre?

Answer : Some members of the Constituent Assembly argued for a strong Centre, linking it to the political situation of the time. Jawaharlal Nehru, in a letter to the President of the Constituent Assembly, stated, “Now that partition is a settled fact, … it would be injurious to the interests of the country to provide for a weak central authority which would be incapable of ensuring peace, of coordinating vital matters of common concern and of speaking effectively for the whole country in the international sphere.” The violence of the times gave a further push to centralisation, now seen as necessary both to forestall chaos and to plan for the country’s economic development. After Partition, most nationalists changed their position because they felt that the earlier political pressures for a decentralised structure were no longer there. There was already a unitary system in place, imposed by the colonial government. The Constitution thus showed a distinct bias towards the rights of the Union of India over those of its constituent states.

The Draft Constitution provided for three lists of subjects: Union, State, and Concurrent. Many more items were placed under exclusive Union control than in other federations, and more placed on the Concurrent list too than desired by the provinces. The Union also had control of minerals and key industries. Article 356 gave the Centre the powers to take over a state administration on the recommendation of the Governor.

Sir A. Ramaswamy Mudaliar from Mysore questioned the notion that proposing a strong Centre made one a better patriot, saying, “Let us not lay the flattering unction to our soul that we are better patriots if we propose a strong Centre and that those who advocate a more vigorous examination of these resources are people with not enough of national spirit or patriotism.”

8. How did the Constituent Assembly seek to resolve the language controversy?

Answer : The Language Committee of the Constituent Assembly produced its report and decided, but not yet formally declared, that Hindi in the Devanagari script would be the official language, but the transition to Hindi would be gradual. For the first fifteen years, English would continue to be used for all official purposes. Each province was to be allowed to choose one of the regional languages for official work within the province. By referring to Hindi as the official rather than the national language, the Language Committee hoped to placate ruffled emotions and arrive at a solution that would be acceptable to all. Shrimati G. Durgabai from Madras explained her worries about the opposition in the south against Hindi, which was very strong. She informed the House that opponents felt this propaganda for Hindi cut at the very root of the provincial languages. Many members appealed for a spirit of accommodation. T. A. Ramalingam Chettiar from Madras emphasized that whatever was done had to be done with caution; the cause of Hindi would not be helped if it was pushed too aggressively. The fears of the people, even if they were unjustified, had to be allayed, or else there would be bitter feelings left behind. When they wanted to live together and form a united nation, there should be mutual adjustment and no question of forcing things on people.

Extras

Additional questions and answers

1. When did the Constitution of India come into effect?

Answer: The Indian Constitution came into effect on 26 January 1950.

2. During which period was the Constitution of India framed?

Answer: The Constitution of India was framed between December 1946 and November 1949.

3. How many sessions were held by the Constituent Assembly?

Answer: In all, the Constituent Assembly held eleven sessions.

4. Who moved the Objectives Resolution?

Answer: It was Jawaharlal Nehru who moved the crucial “Objectives Resolution”.

5. Who was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution?

Answer: B.R. Ambedkar served as Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution.

6. Name any two members of the Drafting Committee apart from Ambedkar.

Answer: Serving with B.R. Ambedkar on the Drafting Committee were two other lawyers, K.M. Munshi from Gujarat and Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyar from Madras.

7. Who was the Constitutional Advisor to the Government of India?

Answer: B. N. Rau was the Constitutional Advisor to the Government of India.

8. What was the primary role of S.N. Mukherjee in framing the Constitution?

Answer: S. N. Mukherjee was the Chief Draughtsman, who had the ability to put complex proposals in clear legal language.

9. Who made a plea for continuing separate electorates on August 27, 1947?

Answer: On 27 August 1947, B. Pocker Bahadur from Madras made a powerful plea for continuing separate electorates.

10. Who strongly opposed the demand for separate electorates?

Answer: Sardar Patel declared that separate electorates was a “poison that has entered the body politic of our country” and urged to do away with it.

11. Who argued that separate electorates would be “suicidal” to minorities?

Answer: During the debate on 27 August 1947, Govind Ballabh Pant argued, “I believe separate electorates will be suicidal to the minorities”.

12. Which member argued that the real minorities were the poor and downtrodden?

Answer: N.G. Ranga, a socialist who had been a leader of the peasant movement, urged that the term minorities be interpreted in economic terms, stating the real minorities were the poor and the downtrodden, the masses of this country.

13. Who represented the tribal community in the Constituent Assembly?

Answer: The tribals had among its representatives to the Assembly the gifted orator Jaipal Singh.

14. Who demanded justice for women instead of reserved seats?

Answer: Hansa Mehta of Bombay demanded justice for women, not reserved seats, or separate electorates.

15. Who argued for a reallocation of powers between Centre and States?

Answer: The rights of the states were most eloquently defended by K. Santhanam from Madras, who felt a reallocation of powers was necessary.

16. Name the three lists provided by the Draft Constitution for distributing powers.

Answer: The Draft Constitution provided for three lists of subjects for distributing powers:

(i) Union
(ii) State
(iii) Concurrent

17. What were the major aims behind the creation of the Indian Constitution?

Answer: The Indian Constitution was designed to keep the country together, and to take it forward. It sought to heal wounds of the past and the present, to make Indians of different classes, castes and communities come together in a shared political experiment. It also sought to nurture democratic institutions in what had long been a culture of hierarchy and deference. The Constitution proclaimed India to be an “Independent Sovereign Republic”, guaranteed its citizens justice, equality and freedom, and assured adequate safeguards for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and Depressed and Other Backward Classes. A further objective was to fuse the liberal ideas of democracy with the socialist idea of economic justice, and re-adapt and re-work all these ideas within the Indian context, contributing to the making of a unified nation state where every individual had to be moulded into a citizen of the State.

18. Why did the Constituent Assembly need to be elaborate and carefully drafted?

Answer: The Indian Constitution needed to be an elaborate, carefully-worked-out, and painstakingly drafted document because of the country’s size and diversity. At Independence, India was not merely large and diverse, but also deeply divided. Therefore, a Constitution designed to keep the country together, and to take it forward, had necessarily to be elaborate and complex.

19. Briefly describe the political background at the time of Independence.

Answer: The years immediately preceding the making of the Constitution were exceptionally tumultuous, a time of great hope but also abject disappointment. India had been made free, but it had also been divided. Fresh in popular memory were the Quit India struggle of 1942, the bid by Subhas Chandra Bose to win freedom through armed struggle, and the rising of the ratings of the Royal Indian Navy in 1946. There were also periodic mass protests of workers and peasants. A striking feature of these upsurges was the degree of Hindu-Muslim unity they manifested. In contrast, the Congress and the Muslim League had failed to achieve religious reconciliation. The Great Calcutta Killings of August 1946 began a year of continuous rioting across northern and eastern India, culminating in massacres during the Partition. Millions of refugees were on the move, and many perished. Another serious problem was the ambiguous constitutional status of the princely states, with some rulers dreaming of independent power.

20. How were the members of the Constituent Assembly chosen?

Answer: The members of the Constituent Assembly were not elected on the basis of universal franchise. In the winter of 1945-46, provincial elections were held in India. The Provincial Legislatures then chose the representatives to the Constituent Assembly.

21. What was the stance of the Muslim League regarding the Constituent Assembly?

Answer: The Muslim League chose to boycott the Constituent Assembly, pressing its demand for Pakistan with a separate constitution.

22. What was the Objectives Resolution?

Answer: Introduced by Jawaharlal Nehru on 13 December 1946, the Objectives Resolution was a momentous resolution that outlined the defining ideals of the Constitution of Independent India, and provided the framework within which the work of constitution-making was to proceed. It proclaimed India to be an “Independent Sovereign Republic”, guaranteed its citizens justice, equality and freedom, and assured that “adequate safeguards shall be provided for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and Depressed and Other Backward Classes … “.

23. Why was the term “democratic” initially avoided in the Objectives Resolution?

Answer: Jawaharlal Nehru explained that the word “democratic” was not used in the Objectives Resolution because it was thought to be obvious that the word “republic” contains that word. They did not want to use unnecessary words and redundant words. Furthermore, Nehru stated that they had done something much more than using the word by giving the content of democracy, including economic democracy, in the Resolution.

24. What concerns did Somnath Lahiri raise about the Constituent Assembly?

Answer: Somnath Lahiri, a Communist member, saw the dark hand of British imperialism hanging over the deliberations of the Constituent Assembly. He argued that the imposition from the British was present, as the British Plan made the future Constitution dependent on a treaty satisfactory to the British and required running to the Federal Court or England for differences. He stated that the Assembly was under the shadow of British guns, army, and their economic and financial stranglehold, meaning final power was still in British hands. He pointed out that statements by Attlee suggested the British might threaten division. Lahiri exhorted his colleagues to realise that the Constituent Assembly was British-made and was “working the British plans as the British should like it to be worked out”.

25. What was Nehru’s view regarding the Constituent Assembly’s legitimacy?

Answer: Nehru admitted that the British Government had a “hand in its birth” and had attached certain conditions within which the Assembly had to function. However, he emphasised that one must not ignore the source from which the Assembly derived its strength. Nehru added that governments are the expression of the will of the people, and the Assembly met because of the strength of the people behind them, and they would go as far as the people as a whole wished them to go.

26. Why did many nationalists oppose separate electorates after Partition?

Answer: After Partition, many nationalists were fervently opposed to the idea of separate electorates because they were haunted by the fear of continued civil war, riots and violence. Sardar Patel described separate electorates as a “poison that has entered the body politic of our country”, and a demand that had turned one community against another, divided the nation, caused bloodshed, and led to the tragic partition of the country.

27. Explain briefly why G.B. Pant opposed separate electorates.

Answer: Govind Ballabh Pant opposed separate electorates because he believed they were not only harmful for the nation but also suicidal for the minorities. He argued that this demand would permanently isolate the minorities, make them vulnerable, cripple them with a feeling of frustration, and deprive them of any effective say within the government, preventing them from ever becoming an integral part of the nation and guiding its destinies.

28. According to N.G. Ranga, who were the “real minorities” in India?

Answer: According to N.G. Ranga, the real minorities were the poor and the downtrodden, the masses of the country. He specified these were not the Hindus in Pakistan provinces, Sikhs, or Muslims, but the people who were so depressed, oppressed, and suppressed that they could not take advantage of ordinary civil rights, including tribal people exploited by merchants and ordinary villagers exploited by money-lenders and landlords.

29. What arguments did Jaipal Singh present regarding the tribals’ rights?

Answer: Jaipal Singh argued for the need to protect the tribes and ensure conditions to help them reach the level of the general population. He stated that tribals were not a numerical minority but needed protection as they had been disgracefully treated, neglected, dispossessed of their land, deprived of forests and pastures, and forced to move. Society perceived them as primitive and backward and spurned them. He pleaded for breaking the emotional and physical distance, stating, “Our point is that you have got to mix with us. We are willing to mix with you”. While not asking for separate electorates, he felt reservation of seats in the legislature was essential for tribals to represent themselves and compel others to hear their voice and come near them.

30. What were some key recommendations to abolish untouchability?

Answer: The Constituent Assembly finally recommended that untouchability be abolished, Hindu temples be thrown open to all castes, and seats in legislatures and jobs in government offices be reserved for the lowest castes.

31. Summarise the controversy regarding the national language issue.

Answer: The national language issue was a major controversy in the Constituent Assembly, debated intensely over many months. The core question was how to forge a nation with diverse languages and cultural heritages. While the Congress, influenced by Mahatma Gandhi, had earlier accepted Hindustani (a blend of Hindi and Urdu) for its composite nature and potential to unify communities, the language had been changing. Hindi was becoming increasingly Sanskritised and Urdu more Persianised, linking language to religious identities. In the Assembly, proponents like R.V. Dhulekar aggressively pushed for Hindi in Devanagari script to be the National Language, not just official, sparking commotion. The Language Committee proposed a compromise: Hindi as the official language with a 15-year transition using English, and provincial autonomy for regional languages. However, this faced strong opposition from non-Hindi speaking areas, particularly the south, where members like G. Durgabai expressed fears that the push for Hindi was an attempt to suppress other powerful regional languages and undermine India’s composite culture. Appeals for caution, mutual adjustment, and avoiding imposition were made to prevent bitterness.

32. Explain why Dhulekar advocated for Hindi as the national language.

Answer: R. V. Dhulekar advocated strongly for Hindi because he believed it should be the language of constitution-making and the National Language of India, not merely an Official Language. He viewed those in the Assembly unfamiliar with Hindustani as unworthy of membership. He attacked the compromise proposed by the Language Committee and mocked those who supported Hindustani over Hindi in the name of Mahatma Gandhi. For Dhulekar, Hindi becoming the official language was the “consummation of a historic process.”

33. Why was there opposition to Hindi in non-Hindi-speaking areas?

Answer: There was opposition to Hindi in non-Hindi-speaking areas because, as explained by Shrimati G. Durgabai, people in these regions felt that the push for Hindi was a fight to prevent the natural influence of other powerful Indian languages on the nation’s composite culture. Opponents felt that the propaganda for Hindi “cuts at the very root of the provincial languages”. T. A. Ramalingam Chettiar also highlighted the fears of the people in the south, stating that pushing Hindi too aggressively would leave “bitter feelings left behind” and stressed the need for mutual adjustment rather than forcing the language on people.

34. Describe the political and social challenges faced by India immediately after independence.

Answer: At Independence, India was not merely large and diverse, but also deeply divided. The years immediately preceding the making of the Constitution had been exceptionally tumultuous: a time of great hope, but also of abject disappointment. India had been made free, but it had also been divided. Fresh in popular memory were the Quit India struggle of 1942, the bid by Subhas Chandra Bose to win freedom through armed struggle, and the rising of the ratings of the Royal Indian Navy in 1946. Through the late 1940s there were periodic, if scattered, mass protests of workers and peasants. The Congress and the Muslim League had repeatedly failed to arrive at a settlement for religious reconciliation. The Great Calcutta Killings of August 1946 began a year of almost continuous rioting across northern and eastern India, culminating in the massacres that accompanied the transfer of populations when Partition was announced. Innumerable Muslims in India, and Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan, were faced with a cruel choice between sudden death or forcible tearing away from their age-old roots. Millions of refugees were on the move, and many perished. Another serious problem was that of the princely states; approximately one-third of the subcontinent was under the control of nawabs and maharajas whose constitutional status remained ambiguous after the British left, with some beginning “to luxuriate in wild dreams of independent power”.

35. Explain how the Congress party dominated the Constituent Assembly despite diverse internal opinions.

Answer: The members of the Constituent Assembly were chosen by the Provincial Legislatures following provincial elections in the winter of 1945-46. The Congress swept the general seats in these elections. Although the Muslim League captured most of the reserved Muslim seats, it chose to boycott the Constituent Assembly, pressing its demand for Pakistan with a separate constitution. The Socialists too were initially unwilling to join, believing the Assembly was a creation of the British. In effect, therefore, 82 per cent of the members of the Constituent Assembly were also members of the Congress. However, the Congress was not a party with one voice; its members differed in their opinion on critical issues. Some were inspired by socialism while others were defenders of landlordism; some were close to communal parties while others were assertively secular. Through the national movement, Congress members had learnt to debate their ideas in public and negotiate their differences, and they continued this practice within the Constituent Assembly.

36. How did public opinions influence the Constituent Assembly debates?

Answer: The discussions within the Constituent Assembly were influenced by the opinions expressed by the public. As the deliberations continued, the arguments were reported in newspapers, and the proposals were publicly debated. Criticisms and counter-criticisms in the press in turn shaped the nature of the consensus that was ultimately reached on specific issues. To create a sense of collective participation, the public was also asked to send in their views on what needed to be done. Many linguistic minorities wanted protection for their mother tongue, religious minorities asked for special safeguards, while dalits demanded an end to caste oppression and reservation of seats. Important issues of cultural rights and social justice raised in these public discussions were debated on the floor of the Assembly.

37. What significant contributions did Jawaharlal Nehru and Vallabhbhai Patel make in framing the Constitution?

Answer: Of the six members who played particularly important roles in the Constituent Assembly, three were representatives of the Congress: Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabh Bhai Patel and Rajendra Prasad. It was Nehru who moved the crucial “Objectives Resolution”, as well as the resolution proposing the National Flag of India. Patel, on the other hand, worked mostly behind the scenes, playing a key role in the drafting of several reports, and working to reconcile opposing points of view.

38. How did Ambedkar’s role as Chairman of the Drafting Committee influence the framing of the Constitution?

Answer: B.R. Ambedkar, a lawyer and economist, served as Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution, having been asked to join the Union Cabinet as law minister on the advice of Mahatma Gandhi. In this capacity, Ambedkar himself had the responsibility of guiding the Draft Constitution through the Assembly. Serving with him were two other lawyers, K.M. Munshi and Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyar, who gave crucial inputs. Ambedkar was given vital assistance by civil servants B. N. Rau and S. N. Mukherjee.

39. Why did Jawaharlal Nehru emphasise the importance of creativity rather than imitation in drafting the Constitution?

Answer: In his speech on the Objectives Resolution, Jawaharlal Nehru located the history of constitution-making in India within a longer history of struggle for liberty and freedom, linking it to revolutionary moments like the American and French Revolutions. However, he was not suggesting that those events provided a blueprint or that their ideas could be mechanically borrowed and applied. He stressed that the ideals and provisions of the constitution introduced in India could not be just derived from elsewhere. “We are not going just to copy”, he said. The system of government established in India had to “fit in with the temper of our people and be acceptable to them”. While it was necessary to learn from the West’s achievements and failures, Western nations also had to learn from experiments elsewhere and change their own notions of democracy. Nehru’s plea was for creative thinking about what was appropriate for India, fusing liberal ideas of democracy with the socialist idea of economic justice, and re-adapting and re-working these ideas within the Indian context.

40. Explain the controversy surrounding separate electorates in the Constituent Assembly.

Answer: The demand for continuing separate electorates, made powerfully by B. Pocker Bahadur from Madras on 27 August 1947, provoked anger and dismay amongst most nationalists. Bahadur argued that minorities exist in all lands and needed a political framework where they could live in harmony with others, which was possible only if they were well represented, their voices heard, and views taken into account, achievable only through separate electorates as non-Muslims could not understand Muslims’ needs or choose their true representative. Most nationalists saw separate electorates as a measure deliberately introduced by the British to divide the people. R.V. Dhulekar called it the game played by the English. Sardar Patel declared it a “poison that has entered the body politic”, a demand that turned communities against each other, divided the nation, caused bloodshed, and led to Partition. He urged to do away with it for peace. Govind Ballabh Pant argued it was suicidal for the minorities, permanently isolating them, making them vulnerable, and depriving them of any effective say in government. He stressed that minorities could never convert into a majority if isolated and could not become an integral part of the nation. Behind these arguments was the concern for building political unity and forging a unified nation state where every individual was a citizen of the State. Not all Muslims supported the demand; Begum Aizaas Rasul felt it was self-destructive, isolating minorities. By 1949, most Muslim members agreed it was against minority interests.

41. Discuss how the Constituent Assembly addressed the needs and rights of tribals and the depressed castes.

Answer: Jaipal Singh, representing tribals (Adibasis), spoke eloquently on the need to protect them and ensure conditions for them to reach the level of the general population. He highlighted their history of exploitation, dispossession from land, forests, and pastures, and being perceived as primitive and backward. He pleaded for breaking the emotional and physical distance, stating “Our point is that you have got to mix with us. We are willing to mix with you”. While not asking for separate electorates, he felt reservation of seats in the legislature was essential for tribals to represent themselves and compel others to hear their voice.

For the Depressed Castes, some members emphasised that their problem couldn’t be solved by protection and safeguards alone, as their disabilities stemmed from social norms and moral values of caste society. J. Nagappa stated, “We have been suffering, but we are prepared to suffer no more.” K.J. Khanderkar described how they were suppressed for thousands of years. After Partition violence, Ambedkar no longer argued for separate electorates. The Constituent Assembly finally recommended that untouchability be abolished, Hindu temples be thrown open to all castes, and seats in legislatures and jobs in government offices be reserved for the lowest castes. Many recognised this wouldn’t solve all problems and attitudes within society needed to change, but the measures were welcomed.

42. Explain the reasons behind the demand for greater provincial powers.

Answer: The rights of the states were most eloquently defended by K. Santhanam from Madras. He felt a reallocation of powers was necessary to strengthen both the states and the Centre, arguing against the “obsession” that adding powers to the Centre made it strong. He believed if the Centre was overburdened, it could not function effectively, and relieving it of some functions by transferring them to the states would actually make the Centre stronger. Santhanam felt the proposed allocation of powers, especially the fiscal provisions where most taxes except land revenue were preserved for the Centre, would impoverish the provinces and cripple them, preventing them from undertaking development projects like education and sanitation without asking the Centre for doles. He warned that without scrutiny, the provinces would revolt against the Centre. Many others from the provinces echoed these fears, fighting for fewer items on the Concurrent and Union lists. A member from Orissa warned that the Centre was likely to break due to excessive centralisation.

43. Why did some members advocate strongly for a centralised government?

Answer: The argument for greater power to the provinces provoked a strong reaction. The need for a strong centre was underlined numerous times. Ambedkar wanted “a strong and united Centre… much stronger than the Centre we had created under the Government of India Act of 1935”. Reminding members of the riots and violence, many repeatedly stated that the Centre’s powers had to be greatly strengthened to enable it to stop the communal frenzy. Gopalaswami Ayyangar declared “the Centre should be made as strong as possible”. Balakrishna Sharma argued that only a strong centre could plan for the country’s well-being, mobilise economic resources, establish proper administration, and defend against foreign aggression. After Partition, most nationalists felt the earlier pressures for a decentralised structure (to assure the Muslim League) were gone. The violence of the times gave a further push to centralisation, seen as necessary to forestall chaos and plan economic development.

44. Discuss the arguments presented for and against Hindi as the national language.

Answer: By the 1930s, Congress accepted Hindustani (a blend of Hindi and Urdu) as the national language, supported by Mahatma Gandhi who felt it was easily understood by common people and could unify Hindus, Muslims, and people of north and south due to its composite nature. However, as communal conflicts deepened, Hindi started being Sanskritised and Urdu Persianised, associating language with religious identities.

In the Assembly, R. V. Dhulekar aggressively pleaded for Hindi as the language of constitution-making and later as the National Language, attacking those who protested it was being forced. This perturbed many members. Shrimati G. Durgabai from Madras explained the strong opposition in the south, where people felt the push for Hindi was a fight against the natural influence of other powerful Indian languages. She expressed shock at the agitation against Hindi after years of propagating it in the south following Gandhi’s call, noting that Hindustani’s inclusive character was being eroded by removing Urdu and regional words. Shri Shankarrao Deo and T. A. Ramalingam Chettiar appealed for accommodation and caution, warning against pushing Hindi too aggressively to avoid bitter feelings and ensure mutual adjustment for a united nation.

45. What measures were taken to resolve the controversy over the national language?

Answer: By 12 September 1947, the Language Committee of the Constituent Assembly had produced its report and thought of a compromise formula to resolve the deadlock. It decided that Hindi in the Devanagari script would be the official language, but the transition to Hindi would be gradual. For the first fifteen years, English would continue to be used for all official purposes. Each province was to be allowed to choose one of the regional languages for official work within the province. By referring to Hindi as the official rather than the national language, the Committee hoped to placate ruffled emotions and arrive at a solution acceptable to all.

46. Analyse the significance of Jawaharlal Nehru’s “Objectives Resolution” in framing the Indian Constitution.

Answer: On 13 December 1946, Jawaharlal Nehru introduced the “Objectives Resolution” in the Constituent Assembly. It was a momentous resolution that outlined the defining ideals of the Constitution of Independent India, and provided the framework within which the work of constitution-making was to proceed. It proclaimed India to be an “Independent Sovereign Republic”, guaranteed its citizens justice, equality and freedom, and assured that “adequate safeguards shall be provided for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and Depressed and Other Backward Classes”. In his speech, Nehru placed the Indian experiment in a broad historical perspective, linking it to revolutionary moments like the American and French Revolutions, while stressing that their ideas could not be mechanically borrowed. He suggested that the specific form of democracy had to be decided through deliberations and that the system of government established in India had to “fit in with the temper of our people and be acceptable to them”. The objective of the Indian Constitution would be to fuse the liberal ideas of democracy with the socialist idea of economic justice, and re-adapt and re-work all these ideas within the Indian context. Nehru’s plea was for creative thinking about what was appropriate for India.

47. Explain how the Constituent Assembly addressed the conflicting demands for minority rights.

Answer: The Constituent Assembly addressed the conflicting demands for minority rights through intense debate and discussion, evolving answers through the clash of opinions. While some members like B. Pocker Bahadur argued for continuing separate electorates to ensure minorities had a meaningful voice and their needs were understood, most nationalists strongly opposed this, viewing it as a British ploy to divide Indians and fearing it would perpetuate division and violence, especially after Partition. Leaders like Sardar Patel and Govind Ballabh Pant argued separate electorates were a poison and suicidal for minorities, isolating them and depriving them of effective say. The Assembly recognized minorities existed and needed a framework for harmonious coexistence. While rejecting separate electorates (by 1949, most Muslim members agreed they were against minority interests), the Assembly provided safeguards. It interpreted minorities in economic terms as well (N.G. Ranga highlighting the poor and downtrodden) and addressed the specific concerns of tribals (Jaipal Singh demanding protection and reserved seats) and Depressed Castes (abolishing untouchability, opening temples, reserving seats and jobs). The Constitution guaranteed cultural and educational rights (Articles 29, 30) and rights to equality (Articles 14, 16, 17), ensuring all religions received equal treatment from the state and the right to maintain charitable institutions, thus forging a middle ground.

48. Evaluate the arguments against separate electorates presented by nationalists like Sardar Patel and G.B. Pant.

Answer: Sardar Patel argued against separate electorates by stating they were a “poison that has entered the body politic of our country”. He contended that the demand for separate electorates had turned one community against another, divided the nation, caused bloodshed, and led to the tragic partition. He questioned if any free country had separate electorates and urged members to do away with them for peace. Patel asserted that the British introduced this element for their administrative ease and left this “mischief behind,” which India should not perpetuate.

Govind Ballabh Pant argued that separate electorates were not only harmful for the nation but also “suicidal to the minorities” themselves. He believed this system would permanently isolate minorities, make them vulnerable, cripple them with frustration from the beginning, and deprive them of any effective say within the government. He questioned if minorities wished to remain minorities forever or become an integral part of the nation, arguing isolation would prevent them from achieving this ideal and would be extremely dangerous, like being kept in an air-tight compartment. Pant stressed that minorities returned by separate electorates could never have an effective voice. He also emphasized the need for citizens to move beyond thinking in terms of communities and focus on being citizens of the State to build political unity.

49. Evaluate how the Indian Constitution incorporated secularism through its Fundamental Rights.

Answer: The Indian Constitution incorporated secularism not through a ringing pronouncement in the Preamble (at the time of framing), but operationally through a series of carefully drafted Fundamental Rights. Key features were spelled out in an exemplary manner:

Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28): Guaranteed individuals the right to practice, profess, and propagate their religion.
Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29, 30): Protected the rights of minorities to conserve their distinct language, script, or culture, and to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
Rights to Equality (Articles 14, 16, 17): Ensured equality before the law and equal protection of the laws, prohibited discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth (especially in employment), and abolished untouchability.

These rights collectively ensured that all religions were guaranteed equal treatment by the State and were given the right to maintain charitable institutions. The State also sought to distance itself from religious communities by banning compulsory religious instructions in State-run schools and colleges and declaring religious discrimination in employment illegal. However, it maintained a kind of judicious distance rather than absolute separation, creating legal space for social reform within communities, such as banning untouchability and introducing changes in personal and family laws.

Additional MCQs

1. When did the Indian Constitution come into effect?

A. 15 August 1947
B. 26 January 1950
C. December 1949
D. 9 December 1946

Answer: B. 26 January 1950

2. What notable distinction does the Indian Constitution hold?

A. Shortest document
B. Most amended
C. Longest constitution in the world
D. First written constitution

Answer: C. Longest constitution in the world

3. Between which months and years was the Indian Constitution framed?

A. January 1947 to December 1947
B. December 1946 to November 1949
C. August 1947 to January 1950
D. May 1946 to May 1949

Answer: B. December 1946 to November 1949

4. How many sessions did the Constituent Assembly hold during its deliberations?

A. 5 sessions
B. 11 sessions
C. 20 sessions
D. 15 sessions

Answer: B. 11 sessions

5. What major event occurred on 15 August 1947 in India?

A. The signing of the Constitution
B. The declaration of a republic
C. India’s Independence and the start of Partition
D. The beginning of the Constituent Assembly sessions

Answer: C. India’s Independence and the start of Partition

6. Which popular movement against British rule is mentioned in the chapter?

A. Non-cooperation Movement
B. Quit India struggle
C. Swadeshi Movement
D. Civil Disobedience Movement

Answer: B. Quit India struggle

7. Who delivered the famous “tryst with destiny” speech in the Constituent Assembly?

A. Vallabh Bhai Patel
B. Rajendra Prasad
C. B.R. Ambedkar
D. Jawaharlal Nehru

Answer: D. Jawaharlal Nehru

8. On which date did Jawaharlal Nehru introduce the Objectives Resolution?

A. 15 August 1947
B. 9 December 1946
C. 13 December 1946
D. 26 January 1950

Answer: C. 13 December 1946

9. The Objectives Resolution proclaimed India to be which of the following?

A. Federal Dominion
B. Independent Sovereign Republic
C. Democratic Monarchy
D. Communist State

Answer: B. Independent Sovereign Republic

10. What symbol was proposed to be at the centre of the Indian national flag?

A. A lotus
B. A star
C. A wheel in navy blue
D. A crescent

Answer: C. A wheel in navy blue

11. Which leader worked mostly behind the scenes to reconcile opposing views during the drafting process?

A. Jawaharlal Nehru
B. Vallabh Bhai Patel
C. Rajendra Prasad
D. B.R. Ambedkar

Answer: B. Vallabh Bhai Patel

12. Who served as the President of the Constituent Assembly?

A. Jawaharlal Nehru
B. Vallabh Bhai Patel
C. Rajendra Prasad
D. B.R. Ambedkar

Answer: C. Rajendra Prasad

13. Who was the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution?

A. B.R. Ambedkar
B. K.M. Munshi
C. Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyar
D. S.N. Mukherjee

Answer: A. B.R. Ambedkar

14. How were the members of the Constituent Assembly chosen?

A. Through universal elections
B. Appointed by the British Government
C. Chosen by Provincial Legislatures
D. Inherited positions

Answer: C. Chosen by Provincial Legislatures

15. Approximately what percentage of the Constituent Assembly members belonged to the Congress?

A. 50%
B. 70%
C. 82%
D. 95%

Answer: C. 82%

16. Which of the following was guaranteed by the Objectives Resolution?

A. Monarchical privileges
B. Justice, equality, and freedom
C. A feudal system
D. British administrative control

Answer: B. Justice, equality, and freedom

17. According to Nehru, how should India approach adopting democratic models?

A. By copying Western models exactly
B. By rejecting all foreign ideas
C. By improving upon existing models to suit Indian needs
D. By following the British system strictly

Answer: C. By improving upon existing models to suit Indian needs

18. Who warned that the Constituent Assembly was “working the British plans as the British should like it to be worked out”?

A. Jawaharlal Nehru
B. Somnath Lahiri
C. Vallabh Bhai Patel
D. Rajendra Prasad

Answer: B. Somnath Lahiri

19. Which leader from Madras advocated for continuing separate electorates for minorities?

A. Govind Ballabh Pant
B. B. Pocker Bahadur
C. Jaipal Singh
D. Shrimati G. Durgabai

Answer: B. B. Pocker Bahadur

20. Which leader described separate electorates as a “poison” that divided the nation?

A. Jawaharlal Nehru
B. B.R. Ambedkar
C. Sardar Patel
D. N.G. Ranga

Answer: C. Sardar Patel

21. What did Govind Ballabh Pant argue about separate electorates?

A. They would strengthen minority voices
B. They were essential for unity
C. They would be suicidal to the minorities
D. They would benefit the majority

Answer: C. They would be suicidal to the minorities

22. According to N.G. Ranga, who were the “real minorities” in India?

A. Religious minorities
B. Linguistic minorities
C. The masses (poor and downtrodden)
D. Political elites

Answer: C. The masses (poor and downtrodden)

23. Which representative of the tribals argued for reserved seats in the legislature?

A. Somnath Lahiri
B. Jaipal Singh
C. B.R. Ambedkar
D. Govind Ballabh Pant

Answer: B. Jaipal Singh

24. What major social practice did the Constituent Assembly recommend abolishing?

A. Child marriage
B. Untouchability
C. Caste reservation
D. Polygamy

Answer: B. Untouchability

25. How many subject lists did the Draft Constitution provide for?

A. Two lists
B. Three lists
C. Four lists
D. One list

Answer: B. Three lists

26. Under which Article does the Centre have the power to take over a state administration?

A. Article 356
B. Article 368
C. Article 14
D. Article 25

Answer: A. Article 356

27. Which tax was retained entirely by the Centre?

A. Land revenue
B. Customs duties
C. Sales tax
D. Property tax

Answer: B. Customs duties

28. Which tax is specifically levied and collected by the states?

A. Company taxes
B. Income tax
C. Land and property taxes
D. Customs duties

Answer: C. Land and property taxes

29. Who from Madras argued that overburdening the Centre would cripple the states, advocating a reallocation of powers?

A. K. Santhanam
B. Balakrishna Sharma
C. R.V. Dhulekar
D. S.N. Mukherjee

Answer: A. K. Santhanam

30. Which leader from the United Provinces argued that only a strong Centre could plan for the nation’s well-being and defence?

A. Sardar Patel
B. Balakrishna Sharma
C. Rajendra Prasad
D. N.G. Ranga

Answer: B. Balakrishna Sharma

31. Which language did Mahatma Gandhi advocate as a composite national language for India?

A. Hindi
B. Urdu
C. Sanskrit
D. Hindustani

Answer: D. Hindustani

32. What compromise did the Language Committee propose regarding the official language?

A. Immediate imposition of Hindi
B. Adoption of English as the sole official language
C. Hindi in Devanagari script to be official after a 15‐year transition while retaining English for official use
D. Declaring Urdu as the national language

Answer: C. Hindi in Devanagari script to be official after a 15‐year transition while retaining English for official use

33. Which member stated that those in the Assembly who did not know Hindustani were not worthy to be members?

A. Jawaharlal Nehru
B. R.V. Dhulekar
C. Vallabh Bhai Patel
D. Shrimati G. Durgabai

Answer: B. R.V. Dhulekar

34. Who expressed concern that the imposition of Hindi might erode the influence of other regional languages?

A. R.V. Dhulekar
B. Shrimati G. Durgabai
C. T.A. Ramalingam Chettiar
D. Jaipal Singh

Answer: B. Shrimati G. Durgabai

35. Which key democratic feature of the Indian Constitution was unprecedented compared to other democracies?

A. Bicameral legislature
B. Universal adult franchise
C. Judicial review
D. Direct election of the President

Answer: B. Universal adult franchise

36. Which series of articles in the Constitution guarantee freedom of religion?

A. Articles 14-17
B. Articles 29-30
C. Articles 25-28
D. Article 356

Answer: C. Articles 25-28

37. On what date did the Cabinet Mission announce its constitutional scheme?

A. 16 May 1946
B. 16 June 1946
C. 16 August 1946
D. 29 January 1947

Answer: A. 16 May 1946

38. When did the Constituent Assembly begin its sessions?

A. 14 August 1947
B. 9 December 1946
C. 26 January 1950
D. December 1949

Answer: B. 9 December 1946

39. In which month and year was the Constitution signed?

A. August 1947
B. January 1950
C. December 1949
D. May 1949

Answer: C. December 1949

40. What event took place on the midnight of 14–15 August 1947?

A. Signing of the Constitution
B. The commencement of the Interim Government
C. Celebration of Indian Independence
D. Announcement of the Objectives Resolution

Answer: C. Celebration of Indian Independence

41. Which revolution did Nehru reference to illustrate the emergence of a new type of State?

A. American Revolution
B. French Revolution
C. Russian Revolution
D. Industrial Revolution

Answer: C. Russian Revolution

42. Which leader changed his stance on separate electorates for the Depressed Castes after Partition violence?

A. Sardar Patel
B. B.R. Ambedkar
C. Jawaharlal Nehru
D. N.G. Ranga

Answer: B. B.R. Ambedkar

43. Which leader is credited with stating, “The real minorities are the masses of this country”?

A. Sardar Patel
B. N.G. Ranga
C. Jaipal Singh
D. Govind Ballabh Pant

Answer: B. N.G. Ranga

44. What system of fiscal management does the Constitution mandate?

A. Centralised taxation only
B. Fiscal federalism with division of taxes between Centre and states
C. State-controlled taxation
D. Uniform taxation across the nation

Answer: B. Fiscal federalism with division of taxes between Centre and states

45. What was the primary reason for granting extensive powers to the Centre in the Constitution?

A. To appease regional demands
B. To ensure effective national unity, administration, and defence
C. To replicate colonial rule
D. To limit government intervention

Answer: B. To ensure effective national unity, administration, and defence

46. What was one major effect of the Partition of India as described in the chapter?

A. Rapid industrialisation
B. Millions of refugees on the move
C. Immediate economic prosperity
D. Peaceful integration of communities

Answer: B. Millions of refugees on the move

47. Which event marked the beginning of the debates leading to the Constitution’s framing?

A. The signing of the Cabinet Mission
B. The Constituent Assembly sessions
C. The Direct Action Day
D. The Interim Government formation

Answer: B. The Constituent Assembly sessions

48. Who prepared a series of background papers to aid the Constituent Assembly’s work?

A. S.N. Mukherjee
B. B.N. Rau
C. K.M. Munshi
D. Alladi Krishnaswamy Aiyar

Answer: B. B.N. Rau

49. Who was the Chief Draughtsman responsible for converting complex proposals into clear legal language?

A. S.N. Mukherjee
B. B.N. Rau
C. B.R. Ambedkar
D. K.M. Munshi

Answer: A. S.N. Mukherjee

50. Which major political party boycotted the Constituent Assembly, thereby reducing its representation?

A. Congress
B. Muslim League
C. Socialists
D. Communists

Answer: B. Muslim League

51. When did the Interim Government hold its last meeting?

A. 29 January 1947
B. 16 July 1947
C. 11 August 1947
D. 14 August 1947

Answer: B. 16 July 1947

52. Who was elected as the President of the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan?

A. Jinnah
B. Nehru
C. Patel
D. Ambedkar

Answer: A. Jinnah

53. What did the Constitution ban in state-run schools to support secularism?

A. Foreign language classes
B. Compulsory religious instructions
C. Sports activities
D. History lessons

Answer: B. Compulsory religious instructions

54. Which two historic Constituent Assemblies did Nehru reference as examples in his speech?

A. British and Russian
B. American and French
C. Indian and Pakistani
D. Greek and Roman

Answer: B. American and French

55. On which date did the Muslim League announce Direct Action Day?

A. 16 May 1946
B. 16 June 1946
C. 16 August 1946
D. 29 January 1947

Answer: C. 16 August 1946

56. What event in the spring of 1946 evoked popular sympathy in India?

A. The Direct Action Day
B. The rising ratings of the Royal Indian Navy in Bombay
C. The Cabinet Mission visit
D. The announcement of the Interim Government

Answer: B. The rising ratings of the Royal Indian Navy in Bombay

57. Under which act did the provincial legislatures gain responsibility, leading to the Congress coming to power in most provinces in 1937?

A. Government of India Act of 1909
B. Government of India Act of 1919
C. Government of India Act of 1935
D. Indian Independence Act

Answer: C. Government of India Act of 1935

58. What concern was expressed regarding separate electorates during the debates?

A. They would isolate minorities from the mainstream
B. They would strengthen national unity
C. They were essential for effective governance
D. They would improve economic policies

Answer: A. They would isolate minorities

59. What role did public participation play during the Constituent Assembly debates?

A. The public directly drafted the Constitution
B. The public sent in views and suggestions
C. The public appointed the Assembly members
D. The public conducted the sessions

Answer: B. The public sent in views and suggestions

60. According to the Language Committee’s proposal, what authority did individual provinces have regarding language?

A. They could abolish all regional languages
B. They could choose one regional language for official work
C. They had to adopt Hindi exclusively
D. They were required to follow English only

Answer: B. They could choose one regional language for official work